Register free!

SC Cases - Judgement [ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950 1949 1948 1947 1946 1945 1944 1943 1942 1941 1940 1939 1938 1937 1936 1935 1934 1933 1932 1931 1930 1929 1928 1927 1926 1925 1924 1923 1922 1921 1920 1919 1918 1917 1915 1914 1902 1900 1896 Select Court HC SC Others   First | Prev | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | Next | Last Documents Found: 4365    Title Forum  Year Rajasthan Fianancial Corpn and Anr. vs Offical Liquidator and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 284360] SC 2005 Britannia Industries Ltd. vs CIT [LexDoc Id : 282479] SC 2005 Tata Chemicals Ltd. vs State of Gujarat and Anr [LexDoc Id : 282321] SC 2005 State of M.P. vs Vilru @ Kamal [LexDoc Id : 282320] SC 2005 State of M.P. vs Makhmal Khan and Ors [LexDoc Id : 282319] SC 2005 State of M.P. vs Mahesh Bhoomia [LexDoc Id : 282318] SC 2005 State of M.P. vs Killu @ Kailash Vishwakarma [LexDoc Id : 282317] SC 2005 State of Haryana and Ors. vs Charanjit Singh and Ors [LexDoc Id : 282316] SC 2005 Sayalee Sanjeev Joshi, Member, MPSC, In Re [LexDoc Id : 282315] SC 2005 Chander Pal Singh and Ors. vs Ajay Kumar Joshi and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 282312] SC 2005 CIT vs Avon Flours (P) Ltd. Penalty: Concealment of income-Income assessed at loss-Where the income were after additions was finally assessed at a loss, no penalty was leviable. Expln. 4 of s.271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act [LexDoc Id : 366250] HC (Gujarat) 2005 Dharam Pal vs Pushpa Devi [LexDoc Id : 296342] HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2005 CIT vs Gabrial India Ltd. Penalty: Failure to furnish TDS Certificate-Bona fide mistake-No penalty for failure to furnish the TDS certificate was leviable on the assessee since the delay caused in issuing the certificate under s.203 of th [LexDoc Id : 295156] HC (Madhya Pradesh) 2005 Shyam Prasad Mishra and Anr vs Vijay Pratap Singh and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 293124] HC (Allahabad) 2005 Gopaldas Kukreja vs UOI KVSS, 1998-Time for payment of arrears of tax-AY 1993-94. The declaration filed by the assessee under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme 1998 for the AYs 1988-89 to 1994-95 could not be rejected, as th [LexDoc Id : 287860] Madhya Pradesh HC 2005 Tirath Kumari and Anr. vs State of Haryana [LexDoc Id : 286531] SC 2005 Harisingh and Associates (AOP) vs ITO Validity of revision by CIT-AO taking a possible view-AY 1996-97. The CIT could not set aside the AO's assessment order simply because of a difference of opinion, as the view taken by the AO was a possibl [LexDoc Id : 285336] ITAT (Jodhpur) 2005 State of Rajasthan vs Nav Bharat Construction Co. [LexDoc Id : 285047] SC 2005 Sarup Singh vs State of Punjab [LexDoc Id : 284995] SC 2005 State of U.P. vs Hafiz, Rafiq, Sharif, Lal Mohammed [LexDoc Id : 284989] SC 2005 Rajender Singh vs Governor, Andaman Nicobar Islands Ors. [LexDoc Id : 284918] SC 2005 State Bank of India vs K.C. Tharakan and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 284871] SC 2005 M.M. Malhotra vs UOI and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 284869] SC 2005 Rajkumar Niyati vs ITO Unexplained income-Deposits made in a firm by the partner-AY 1996-97: The addition made to the assessee's income on account of unexplained income could not be sustained, as the assessee had provided a plausib [LexDoc Id : 284624] ITAT Jodhpur 2005 Sait Nagjee Purushotham and Co. Ltd. vs Vimalabai Prabhulal and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 284610] SC 2005   First | Prev | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | Next | Last